Tensions have flared up in the sensitive Sir Creek region. This comes after Pakistan issued a Notice to Mariners (NOTMAR) that overlaps with India's ongoing naval exercise, named Exercise Trishul. This action by Pakistan has raised serious concerns. It impacts maritime boundaries, national control, and strategic areas of coastal waters.
The Sir Creek area is a narrow strip of marshland. It stretches about 96 kilometers. This land lies between Gujarat in India and Sindh in Pakistan. For many decades, this area has been a disputed maritime boundary. The conflict affects several key areas. These include rights over the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), oil exploration, and fishing territories.
India uses a method called the thalweg principle to decide the boundary. This principle states that the border should follow the deepest part of the waterway. However, Pakistan claims the boundary extends to the eastern bank of the creek. This difference in claims has kept the conflict unresolved for a long time.
India is currently conducting Exercise Trishul to strengthen its coastal defenses. Pakistan's NOTMAR now overlaps with India's maritime coordinates. This situation is causing rising tensions in an already sensitive area. Experts warn this could become another flashpoint between India and Pakistan. It brings to mind past events like Pulwama or Balakot.
This post will break down the Sir Creek dispute. We will also look at the importance of the NOTMAR overlap. Finally, we will explore what this means for India's maritime security, naval diplomacy, and the wider geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific region.
For More, Checkout GeoPolitics!
Understanding the Sir Creek Dispute
The Sir Creek dispute is a long-standing issue between India and Pakistan. It centers around a 96-kilometer strip of water. This creek flows into the Arabian Sea. It separates the Kutch region of Gujarat, India, from the Sindh province of Pakistan.
The dispute is not just about a marshland. It holds major importance for both countries. The resolution of this boundary directly affects the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ). An EEZ is an area of the sea in which a sovereign state has special rights. These rights include exploration and use of marine resources. For example, it includes power production from water and wind.
Control over Sir Creek means control over valuable resources. This includes potential oil and gas reserves. It also gives access to rich fishing grounds. The disputed area could also hold strategic importance for military operations. Both countries want to protect their interests in this region.
The Thalweg Principle Versus Pakistan's Claim
The main disagreement comes from two different ways of drawing the boundary.
- India's Stance: The Thalweg Principle India believes the boundary should follow the thalweg principle. This is an international law principle. It states that the boundary in a navigable river or waterway should be the middle of the deepest channel. If this principle were applied, the boundary would largely favor India. It would give India more territory in the creek.
- Pakistan's Stance: Eastern Bank Claim Pakistan, however, claims the boundary lies on the eastern bank of the creek. This claim is based on an old 1914 resolution. If Pakistan's claim were accepted, it would give Pakistan a much larger share of the creek and its resources.
This fundamental difference in how to draw the boundary has made the dispute hard to solve. Both nations have stuck to their positions for decades.
India's Exercise Trishul and Pakistan's NOTMAR
Recently, India began a major military exercise. It is called Exercise Trishul. This exercise is a tri-service exercise. This means it involves the army, navy, and air force working together. The main goal of Exercise Trishul is to improve coastal defense. It also aims to strengthen India's ability to respond to threats.
To conduct this exercise safely, India issued a NOTAM. NOTAM stands for Notice to Airmen. This is a notice filed with an aviation authority. It alerts aircraft pilots of potential hazards along a flight route or at a location that could affect the safety of the flight. India's NOTAM reserved certain air space for its exercise. This notice was issued well in advance, starting from October 30th and lasting until November 11th.
However, Pakistan responded with an unexpected move. It issued its own NOTMAR. NOTMAR stands for Notice to Mariners. This notice is similar to a NOTAM but applies to maritime navigation. It alerts ships and mariners about events that could affect safe navigation. Pakistan's NOTMAR reserved a sea-based zone for its naval firing exercise. This notice was set to be active from November 2nd to November 5th.
The problem arose because Pakistan's NOTMAR zone overlaps with India's NOTAM zone. This means that for a few days, both countries planned to conduct military exercises in overlapping areas. India's exercise covers air space. Pakistan's exercise covers sea space. This overlap, even in different domains, is considered highly reckless.
The Overlap: Air Space vs. Sea Space
The overlap of these two notices is a serious concern. India's NOTAM reserved air space for its tri-service exercise. This means Indian aircraft, missiles, and other aerial vehicles would be operating in that area. They would fly at considerable heights.
Pakistan's NOTMAR, on the other hand, reserved a sea-based zone. This zone is for its live weapon firing exercise. Pakistani naval vessels would operate here. They might conduct firing drills in the water or from the water.
Why is this overlap possible and legal?
This situation raises a key question: How can two countries legally claim the same space for different exercises? The answer lies in international law.
- India's Air Space Claim: India's NOTAM reserves air space. This air space passes over Pakistan's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). According to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), specifically Article 58, the air space above a country's EEZ is considered international air space. This means any country can freely fly through this air space. Therefore, India is legally allowed to reserve this air space for its military exercises. This is true as long as it does not interfere with Pakistan's rights to use the sea below. India followed this international rule. This is why its NOTAM overlaps with Pakistan's EEZ.
- Pakistan's Sea Space Claim: Pakistan also has rights within its own EEZ. UNCLOS allows a country to conduct naval exercises within its EEZ. This is also true as long as it does not disturb international navigation or overflight rights. Pakistan issued its NOTMAR to conduct naval firing exercises in its EEZ.
So, both countries acted within their legal rights. India reserved international air space above Pakistan's EEZ. Pakistan reserved sea space within its own EEZ. They did this for their respective exercises. However, the decision by Pakistan to issue its NOTMAR during India's ongoing exercise is seen as a highly provocative act.
Dangers of Reckless Behavior
While both actions may be legal, Pakistan's move is considered reckless behavior. It intensifies tensions. It increases the risk of serious incidents.
Potential for Accidental Encounters
The main risk is the chance of an accidental encounter.
- Indian aircraft or missiles would be operating at high altitudes in the air space.
- Pakistani ships or possibly even a submarine would be operating in the sea below.
Although they are in different domains (air and sea), a small miscalculation could lead to disaster. For example, an accidental missile trajectory from India's air exercise could fall near a Pakistani ship. Or, naval gunfire from Pakistan could stray into the air space of an Indian aircraft. Such an event, even if unintended, could be seen as an attack. This could trigger a dangerous response.
Miscommunication and Misinterpretation
Another danger is the potential for miscommunication. Even with established hotlines between the two countries, misunderstandings can happen.
- Movements of ships or aircraft could be misinterpreted.
- One side might think the other is preparing for an attack.
These misinterpretations can quickly escalate tensions. In a highly charged environment, a small error could lead to a major conflict. The lack of clear communication or a wrong understanding of intentions could have severe consequences.
Heightened Tensions
The overlap of these exercise zones automatically raises the level of tension. Both countries are already in a state of alert. Conducting exercises at the same time in overlapping areas adds to the pressure. It creates a feeling of distrust and suspicion. This could make it harder to resolve any future disputes peacefully.
Pakistan's decision to issue the NOTMAR suggests a challenge or a "dare." It shows a willingness to operate close to the edge of what is acceptable. This kind of behavior can destabilize the region further. It makes the situation more unpredictable.
India's Maritime Security and Diplomacy
This incident has important implications for India. It affects its maritime security and its role in regional diplomacy.
Protecting India's Maritime Interests
India has a vast coastline. It has significant maritime interests. These include trade routes, fishing zones, and offshore resources. The Sir Creek dispute directly impacts these interests. India needs to ensure the safety and security of its coastal areas. It must also protect its Exclusive Economic Zone.
Exercise Trishul is a clear sign of India's commitment to coastal defense. It shows India's readiness to protect its sovereignty. The overlapping NOTMAR highlights the challenges India faces in securing its maritime borders.
Naval Diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific
The Indo-Pacific region is becoming increasingly important globally. India plays a key role in ensuring stability in this region. Naval diplomacy involves using naval forces to support foreign policy goals. This includes showing presence, conducting joint exercises, and building partnerships.
Incidents like the Sir Creek overlap test India's ability to manage regional tensions. They also test its resolve to maintain peace. India must skillfully navigate these challenges. It needs to do so while upholding international law and protecting its national interests.
Conclusion
The recent overlap of Pakistan's NOTMAR with India's Exercise Trishul zone is a serious development. It brings the long-standing Sir Creek dispute back into the spotlight. While both countries may be acting within their legal rights regarding air and sea space, Pakistan's timing is seen as reckless. It raises the risk of accidental encounters and misinterpretations.
This event underlines the constant need for careful diplomacy and clear communication between India and Pakistan. It also highlights the critical importance of maritime security for both nations. As geopolitical tensions continue to grow, managing such flashpoints responsibly is essential to prevent conflict and ensure stability in the region.
